Huh. Well, given that I have no way to test for AOL and I don't know what their issue is, I guess I'll have to refer to my browser rant. The site is coded to current HTML and CSS standards. Any standards-compliant browser will render it fine.
BTW - I suggest you upgrade to IE7. It still isn't as good as Firefox, but at least Microsoft finally dealt with all of their serious bugs in the older versions of IE.
BTW you use the word "wikipedia" when you mean just "wiki." Wikipedia is one specific wiki, unless it's gone the way of Xerox and become a general-use term.
As far as being ambitious, it seemed like a good way to wrap my head around DotNetNuke. Of course, at the time the notion was that VCMS was going to be thrown out and replaced with DNN so the whole exercise may have been in vain. On the other hand, I wound up getting a free lifetime subscription to the Gold Eagle reader's service out of the deal, so hey - lots of free books every month. That's not so bad.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
BTW - I suggest you upgrade to IE7. It still isn't as good as Firefox, but at least Microsoft finally dealt with all of their serious bugs in the older versions of IE.
From:
no subject
BTW you use the word "wikipedia" when you mean just "wiki." Wikipedia is one specific wiki, unless it's gone the way of Xerox and become a general-use term.
From:
no subject
As far as being ambitious, it seemed like a good way to wrap my head around DotNetNuke. Of course, at the time the notion was that VCMS was going to be thrown out and replaced with DNN so the whole exercise may have been in vain. On the other hand, I wound up getting a free lifetime subscription to the Gold Eagle reader's service out of the deal, so hey - lots of free books every month. That's not so bad.